The course will give major exposure to the tools and information available and necessary for acquiring employment. Not part of a TN Transfer Pathway. Topics included are charting financial objectives; budgeting; consumer borrowing, renting, and buying; investing; employee benefits and taxation. Business letters, memos, e-mail, reports, and presentations, along with other projects, will be covered.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Reading these words of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, one is led to believe that the constitutional protection for the freedom of speech is absolute.
The First Amendment is explicit: If it is guaranteed under the Constitution, therefore, one should assume that colleges and universities, by virtue of their being centers of higher learning, ought to be bastions of freedom of speech. This requisite becomes clear merely by examining the missions of these institutions of learning.
Learning, especially higher learning, could only be achieved in an atmosphere where a free market of ideas exists.
This refers to a place where the free expression and articulation of varied experiences, opinions, beliefs, and even ideologies are not only encouraged but valued. This is necessary because only the healthy debates which result from the clash of unrestricted arguments and counter-arguments every time new ideas are offered for review, criticism, and approval, could separate truth from fabrications, disinformation, or misinformation.
In this context, every statement of opinion, every proposition, every interpretation of events, no matter how far-fetched they might first appear to be, deserves to be heard by others and defended by its author, if only to give chance for knowledge to develop and the process of learning to prosper.
Universities and colleges exist not only to transmit existing knowledge. Hence, any attempt to set down restrictions on this free market of ideas thwarts its growth and reduces its output of new knowledge by inhibiting the dynamic forces that should be working energetically.
In other words, restrictions tend to ruin the whole process. This is the case for colleges and universities in the country and elsewhere. These institutions of higher learning make up the basic components of the free market of ideas and as such, are intrinsic to the process of generating knowledge.
Therefore, if we really want the process to work, if we truly wish the forces to interact dynamically in the free market of ideas and generate knowledge, the judicious choice should be to leave these campuses alone and allow the freedom of speech to reign supreme.
Establishing speech codes on campuses, for instance, does nothing but restrain freedom of speech, thereby preventing the introduction of new ideas and impeding progress. Speech codes started emerging in public colleges and universities between the s and the early part of the s.
According to the proponents of the concept, the objective was to combat discrimination and reduce the growing incidents of harassment being directed at the members of minority groups.
Some observers, however, suspected that the establishment of speech codes was only done by some colleges and universities because it appeared to be politically correct at the time Hudson. Confirming the prevalence of discrimination in college campuses, the American Civil Liberties Union ACLU agreed that hate speeches were indeed observed in many college campuses when it issued the following statement: In recent years, a rise in verbal abuse and violence directed at people of color, lesbians, and gay men, and other historically persecuted groups has plagued the United States.
Among the settings of these expressions of intolerance are college and university campuses, where bias incidents have occurred sporadically since the mids. Outrage, indignation and demands for change have greeted such incidents — understandably, given the lack of racial and social diversity among students, faculty and administrators on most campuses ACLU.
In the face of such developments, organizations representing the minority students, aided and abetted by progressive groups and supported by many members of the academe, conducted a series of mass actions for the purpose of exerting undue pressure on the management of public colleges and universities.
They backed their argument with the claim that hate speeches fall under the category of fighting words which has no protection under the First Amendment because fighting words tend to provoke instant violent reaction. They cited the decision handed down in Chaplinsky v.
In other words, the bone of their contention was that hate speeches, being fighting words, were not necessary for the pursuit of knowledge and should therefore be banned in colleges and universities or in any other centers of learning in the country. Their relentless campaign resulted to the adoption of varying versions of speech codes by more than institutions of learning all over the country.
The administrators of these colleges and universities described their speech codes as tools designed to reduce discrimination and were created specifically to put a stop to hate speeches and campus harassments directed at the members of minority groups. Proponents further claimed that in many colleges and universities, hate speeches caused outrage and ill-feelings and gave rise to hostile environments which proved inimical to the academic growth of students not only from the minority but from the majority groups as well.
For this reason, supporters claimed that such codes were necessary in order to promote an atmosphere of harmony and respect, and allow the different racial, ethnic and religious groups to peacefully co-exist in the campuses dedicated to the pursuit of learning American Association of University Professors.
Their arguments were, however, contradicted by opponents of speech codes who asserted that such codes violate the freedom of speech guaranteed under the constitution. They contended that the right to free speech should be limited by the serious harm, actual or threatened, that speech could cause.An electronic journal of philosophy, promoting the principles and the further development of the Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and the Friesian School, i.e.
Jakob Fries, Leonard Nelson, Rudolf Otto, Karl Popper, F.A. Hayek, etc. History: Kilgore College is a publicly supported, two-year, comprehensive community college offering postsecondary educational opportunities.
In Kilgore College was the idea of Mr. W. L. Dodson and the community of Kilgore, Texas.
Over great problem solution or proposal paper topic ideas, plus sample essays and links to articles on how to write an excellent paper! Speech by SEC Chairman: Closing Remarks to the Second Annual Corporate Governance Summit by Chairman Christopher Cox U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
This bar-code number lets you verify that you're getting exactly the right version or edition of a book. The digit and digit formats both work. Top Successful College Essays. Get into the college of your dreams! We hope these essays inspire you as you write your own personal statement.
Just remember to .